data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da303/da3035a2a209308693f3d2118de32764ee69f1af" alt=""
While a decade ago scientists announced they can use foreign genes into a mosquito genome, a year ago, scientists announced a "theory to practice" successful use of an artificial gene that prevented a virus from replicating within mosquitoes. The problem is it's one virus,
not all of them (virus)!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f8649/f8649abc3e10b747fb37fbe41c3951a9372c1ac9" alt=""
So they replaced a gene with a fake one into a mosquito and now it can't reproduce one virus -
big deal. The real problem is not one virus, it's the mosquito itself, since it carries and favours the reproduce of several bacteria as well, par exemple
Plasmodium.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/788bb/788bb22b0254abc1b97e67d3812545930d327a20" alt=""
Modifying genetically the vectors shouldn't be even a step to take to fight a virus. Fight to kill the vector or just fight another step of the reproducting ("life") cycle, called Vogralik's chain - The steps are:
- Infection's reservoir (mostly humans & animals)
- Way of spread (of the disease)
- Lieu of intake
- Concetration and virulency of the infection agent
- Sensitivy of the host (how immune the host is)
If one of the above is stopped effectively, then the infection will stop reappearing. The point is that it takes a
long time in order to find an adequate way of preventing/stop the life cycle of an infection, especially if the vector
can carry multiple infection agents.
No comments:
Post a Comment